Sexy chating without any upgrade
Uniforms may be cheaper than branded or designer clothing, but they are no way cheaper than street clothing.
Proponents and opponents, both have valid points to back their claims on this contentious issue.The court ruled out that the rights that every American is guaranteed by the First Amendment to Constitution, applies to every student and that schoolchildren, "do not shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gate." People who support uniforms argue that an absence of uniformity can lead to a disruption in the school.However, it has to be noted that assumption plays a larger role than prudence in this claim.One doesn't need to look any further than Bill Clinton's address itself to understand the hypocritical nature of this argument.To quote a few excerpts from his speech,"Today I'm visiting Long Beach, California, a community that has helped to restore order to its schools by requiring elementary and middle school students to wear uniforms...Needless to say, this imposes an additional expense on parents.
With normal clothing, parents have an option to buy from discount stores, used clothing store, etc., to save a considerable sum.
However, the examples of violent behavior that he cites are all related to students in the age-group 15-17.
Across US, elementary and middle school students are being required to comply with the rules of school uniforms, while at the same time, juveniles - who, as statistics show, are involved in most illegal activities - are being excluded.
It is simply impossible to prevent the students from displaying their personal taste even in uniforms.
Opponents of school uniforms are not ignorant about their perceived benefits, but it has to be remembered that the issues that proponents talk about tackling - such as violence and drug abuse - require an effort on war-footing.
However, students may still find ways to stylize their school uniforms.